Pertecnica / Case Study

How Production Efficiency Was Improved by 50% in a Transformer Manufacturing Plant – E-VS-01

A transformer manufacturing plant was facing a common problem: people were working hard, but production was not moving fast enough.Production activities, working methods and process times were reviewed on the shop floor. By changing the way work was organised and removing unnecessary delays, production efficiency improved by approximately 50%.

~50% Improvement in Production Efficiency Industry: Transformer Manufacturing Focus: Production • Time Study • Process Improvement Result: Higher output without simply adding more resourcesProject Highlight
7Case Sections
2Training Areas
APPLIED ENGINEERING
CASE / 27200
PROJECT STORY Challenge · Method · Solution · Outcome
Executive SummaryThe project in one view.

The production team studied the actual work being carried out on the shop floor.

The time required for different activities was measured. Delays, unnecessary movement, waiting time and inefficient work sequences were identified.

The production process was then reorganised.

Some activities were rearranged, some unnecessary steps were removed and available resources were better balanced.

The result was an approximately 50% improvement in production efficiency.

The important lesson was that a large improvement did not always require a large investment.

Project BackgroundContext, scope and operating environment.

The factory had experienced production delays and differences in the time taken to complete similar activities.

Instead of immediately adding manpower or equipment, the production process itself was studied.

The objective was simple:

Find where time was being lost and make the work flow better.

Engineering ChallengeThe problem, constraint, risk or objective.

The main problems were:

Production was taking longer than necessary

Some activities were creating delays for other activities

Work was not evenly balanced

Actual process times were not clearly understood

Manpower and resources were not being used as efficiently as possible

Method & SolutionThe engineering approach and technical reasoning.

1. Observe the actual work

The production process was studied directly on the shop floor.

2. Measure the time

Time studies were used to understand how long different activities actually took.

3. Find the delays

Activities causing waiting, unnecessary movement and process interruptions were identified.

4. Rearrange the work

The sequence of activities was changed wherever a better flow was possible.

5. Improve resource utilisation

Manpower and production resources were better matched with the actual work requirements.

6. Monitor the improvement

Production performance was reviewed after implementation to ensure that the improvement was sustained.

Solution / ImplementationWhat was implemented in practice.

The improvement delivered:

Approximately 50% higher production efficiency

Better use of existing manpower

Smoother production flow

Less unnecessary waiting and movement

Better understanding of actual production times

Improved production discipline

Results / ImpactEvidence of improvement, quality, efficiency or risk reduction.

The real benefit

The biggest lesson was simple:

Before investing in additional resources, understand where the existing resources are losing time.

Training / Learning OutcomesWhat engineers and learners can take from the project.

This case is useful for production managers and plant heads facing:

Low production output

Long manufacturing times

Bottlenecks

Poor manpower utilisation

Uneven workloads

Repeated production delays

09 / LEARNING CONNECTION

Related Training

Training programmes connected to this engineering case.